A few days ago, when I went poking around Blogger for an available blogspot name, I was disappointed to see that my original name of choice – worddiary.blogspot.com – was already taken. I wasn't entirely surprised: 'worddiary' is not terribly creative. For someone who has such a fondness for meaning-bearing morphemes, I sure have a tricky time forcing appropriate words to come to mind.
I didn't take Blogger's alternate suggestions of 'bpw_worddiary' or 'bpwsworddiary' (creative!) nor did I check the availability of the version that appears on the masthead here. Instead, I thought, "Who got to 'worddiary' before me? Who dares to love words more than me? Who also cannot think of a better title? I must know!"
I journeyed over to worddiary.blogspot.com, and let me tell you: the writer is a total ho. A 'word ho', to be precise – her words, not mine. Her last post, which also happens to be her second post, describes her word ho-ing, if you're interested. She hasn't blogged since 05/05/05, yet 'worddiary' remains unavailable.
On an unrelated note: while Word Ho was word-ho-ing that day, I was on Fort Myers Beach drinking a crap-ton of tequila. ¡Viva Cinco de Mayo!
Anyway, seeing "Diary of a Word Ho" at the top of her page got me thinking about the world of hos – word, improperly punctuated, nappy-headed, and otherwise. Yesterday, I mentioned words that crop up in different contexts in rapid succession; oddly, this has been a hoey week.
For example, I finished reading Things That Make Us [Sic] this week. Toward the end, I read about a pet peeve of mine: wanton apostrophe usage. The author stated that when creating art, one needn't abandon conventions of grammar, and she specifically called out hos. It's just as easy to rap about more than one ho, sans apostrophe, as it is to boast of slapping an apostrophe on those ho's (ick). For the record, it's hos, not ho's (unless we're talking about the singular possessive
ho, in which case ho's is correct. Don't forget the plural possessive hos' in case they decide to form a union and demand rights), and I'm glad the Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar agrees with me. Hos may look kind of goofy, but, darn it, it's properly punctuated.
Another way to punctuate 'ho' is with a hyphen and the word 'bag', as in ho-bag. Now, this construction may not be in the OED*, but, man, is it ever an appropriate term for "woman in a too-short dress who is not only loud, obnoxious, and probably coked up, but who also can't seem to stop running into my chair." I got to bandy ho-bag about several times in conversation with my companion on New Year's Eve. Copious booze, blow, and noisemakers can morph even the nicest girls into ho-bags. Like I said, it's been a hoey week.
When I happened on the Word Ho diary, I started thinking more about this little word. Remember when Don Imus combined it with "nappy-headed" to insult the Rutgers University women's basketball team? Wow, Imus, way to pack in so much racism and sexism into three little words. Ugly, ugly, ugly.
Having said that, I ask you not to judge me for the confession I'm about to make: after the Imus incident, I couldn't stop calling my dog a "nappy-headed ho" – as in, "Who's my cute little nappy-headed ho? You're my cute little nappy headed-ho!" I couldn't help it; the phrase has a touch of alliteration and a certain cadence that makes it kind of fun to say. I know I shouldn't perpetuate such hateful notions, but my dog doesn't mind.
What I like most about this particular usage of 'ho' (as opposed to the triple 'ho' Santa exclaims) is that it gives the OED occasion to give the following example of usage:
1994 Straight No Chaser Summer 17/1 It's fat like a $20 ho sittin' on yo face.
Top that, Shakespeare.
*Although the OED doesn't include it, The Urban Dictionary has entries for ho-bag that do not include the hyphen. Since their user-submitted definitions and usage examples are seldom properly punctuated and/or spelled, I'm going to pretend like they don't exist. Ho-bag is hyphenated in my universe.